👀 The search party's over
Plus: Why Gen Z would rather look interesting than rich
May 22, 2026
📩 THE OPENING POSITION
If you're reading this, it's too late… Drake released three albums last week and you've already opened this newsletter.
As The Margin's creative designer, here's what's currently living rent-free in my head this week: the "quiet luxury" aesthetic is finally on its way out after years of everyone dressing like an off-duty hedge fund manager. Spotify swapping their logo for a disco ball and turning everyone and their mom into an art direction critic (and they’re reverting to the old logo anyway). AI slop imagery is becoming so normal that nobody clocks it anymore. All of which is to say: aesthetics and economics are basically the same thing. Trends are just markets with better moodboards, aesthetics are consumer behaviour with a colour palette, and your FYP is a portfolio of your subconscious spending habits. (Coincidentally, so is your credit card.)
Or maybe I've just been staring at visual culture for so long that everything's starting to look like an overpriced design decision. The real finance stuff is below (written by people who are good at words).
– Jenna Zaitchik, Senior Creative Designer
🔔 BEFORE THE BELL
Index | Week (May 19-21, 2026) |
TSX | ▲ +535.71 (1.58%) |
S&P 500 | ▲ +30.22 (0.41%) |
Nasdaq | ▲ +6.69 (0.03%) |
Dow | ▲ +807.22 (1.63%) |
The takeaway: A shorter trading week in Canada due to the Victoria Day weekend saw the “old economy” take the reins, with the Dow and TSX both climbing more than 1.5%. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq barely moved and the S&P 500 crawled forward with 0.41%. Tech took a breather, which is a flip from the past few weeks, when tech was propping up the indices – now, you get Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) dropping -1.75% even though it beat earnings expectations. Wall Street’s bar for success is on Neptune, apparently. Traditional value sectors got their turn, which is why the TSX outperformed: it's heavy in energy and financials.
🔎 THE CONTEXT
Did Google just kill search (and maybe the rest of the internet, too)?

Photo credit: picture alliance/Getty Images
At its annual I/O developer conference this week, Google announced it's replacing search as you know it with AI – basically, they said a lot of stuff that meant "we want to keep you inside Google instead of sending you to other websites." AI Mode, where Gemini answers your questions instead of linking to sources, now has over a billion monthly users, and Google says queries are doubling every quarter.
Understandably, a lot of people are freaked out, especially publishers who rely on search results for traffic and attention (omg hi). This is what many have been calling “Google Zero” – the point where Google just stops referring traffic to websites entirely. The company did clarify that people have to opt in to AI Mode in search, but honestly, a lot of damage was already done before the I/O announcement. When an AI summary appears at the top of search results, users click through to other websites only 8% of the time, compared to 15% without one, and from November 2024 to November 2025, traffic from Google Search to publishers dropped by 33%. Publishers are expecting traffic to decline another 43% over the next three years.
This is more than just a problem for publishers. For 30 years, search engines were the solution to the internet’s most pressing issue: how to find stuff. Now Google is replacing that with a chatbot that scrapes other people’s work, summarizes it, and keeps readers inside its own infrastructure. Social media already filters what you see based on engagement; AI Mode adds another layer, giving Google the power to choose what information surfaces in its summaries and what gets buried. The company's always influenced what people find online, but at least with blue links you could click through and check the source yourself. Now everyone's internet will get filtered through the same AI model.
What this means…
- For advertisers: Google has decided winning the AI race is its paramount priority, and it’s willing to mess with its own ad revenue model to do it. The entire digital advertising ecosystem currently depends on people clicking through to content, but if users stop leaving Google, ad placements become worthless. Not to mention advertisers will lose a valuable way to reach new audiences.
- For the ad-supported internet: A lot of blogs, news sites, and niche forums run on a free-content model – create content, monetize it with ads, and rely on search to bring readers. Businesses also pay Google for search ad placement to reach those readers. But if users never leave Google's ecosystem, both sides lose, and when that model’s gone, a lot of the free internet will go with it.
- For digital media: The usual advice is "just build a direct audience" with things like newsletters (omg hiiiii), subscriptions, online courses, etc. And that’s still a good move! But Google Search is how people discover you exist and how you grow that audience in the first place. When search results don’t send people to other sites anymore, publishers lose the main driver to convert casual readers into loyal subscribers. Even publications with direct audiences need new people to find them. (Unrelated: Please tell your friends to sign up for this newsletter.)
Also:
- Welp, we knew it was coming and now it’s here: Canada's inflation rate rose to 2.8% in April, StatsCan announced Tuesday, driven almost entirely by soaring gas prices. Energy costs increased 19.2% year-over-year, with gasoline up 28.6% due to supply issues caused by the Iran war. At least your car will make a cool lawn ornament.
- Less than six months after taking office, Bolivia's President Rodrigo Paz is facing widespread protests and blockades that have left the capital under siege. The country's economic instability has spiralled into a full-blown political crisis, with demonstrators blocking roads and demanding his resignation. The guy probably hasn’t even learned where all the bathrooms are yet.
- The WHO declared a public health emergency over an Ebola outbreak in Congo that, as of this writing, has resulted in more than 600 cases and 139 deaths. The outbreak involves the Bundibugyo strain, which has no approved vaccine or treatment. Health experts say it won't become another pandemic, but given the recent hantavirus outbreak that killed three on a cruise ship, we’ll understand if you choose to pack some extra N95 masks in your suitcase.

Source: The Daily, Statistics Canada
🤿 ROLLING IN THE DEEP

Photo credit: Mark Yuen Visuals
The Business Of: Ethical fashion in Canada
by Sara Harowitz
The Business Of is a series that breaks down the financial realities of specific jobs and industries in Canada – what comes in, what goes out, and what most people get wrong. This is an excerpt of the first instalment, originally run in full on The Margin.
Free Label, a Vancouver-based ethical fashion brand, charges nearly $100 for a T-shirt, and nearly $170 for a pair of shorts. At those prices, you’d likely assume the company turns quite a healthy profit, but that isn’t the case – on a single shirt, for example, the label actually nets nothing.
Ethical fashion brands, also called slow fashion brands, adhere to an array of values, including ethical production (paying craftspeople a fair wage at every stage of the supply chain), sustainable production (using eco-friendly fabrics and making pieces in small batches to minimize waste), and inclusive sizing (offering more than just extra-small to extra-large in order to better serve a range of bodies). These values come at a cost, as Free Label founder Jess Sternberg knows well.
Sternberg, who now produces her clothing in Vancouver, started Free Label in 2015 in Toronto. “Nobody was making things in Canada,” she says of the time period. “And I found especially, there weren’t a lot of people making anything that was geared towards my body shape, which is a little bit more curvy, and in a way that really celebrates and honours the female body. I thought I could fill that gap.”
She had no entrepreneurship or design experience, instead learning as she went, working with Canadian textile manufacturers, pattern-makers, and sewing factories to produce an array of clothing, available in sizes XS to 5X, that fits all kinds of shapes, including bras that go up to cup size K.
By comparison, fast fashion is typically made overseas, where production costs are much cheaper and workers are paid incredibly low wages to sew poorly-made items in unsafe conditions. Because the fast fashion business model is about volume rather than quality, it’s also bad for the environment: the fashion industry is the second-biggest consumer of water, and fast fashion in particular leads to increased carbon emissions, the production of non-biodegradable microplastics, and toxic chemical run-off in waterways, particularly in countries like Bangladesh, where these clothes are often made.
|
👀 UNSOLICITED OPINIONS

Photo credit: @pearlmedia via Instagram
Boring brands killed brand loyalty, not Gen Z
Jenna Zaitchik, Senior Creative Designer: Everyone says Gen Z has no brand loyalty, but that's backwards. Gen Z is incredibly loyal – they just want a brand that looks like something. An Owala and a gas station tumbler hold the same amount of water, but Owala has fun colour combos and is stealing market share from Stanley.
The minimalist brands millennials built their personalities around are struggling. Glossier's valuation has dropped from $1.8 billion to under $1 billion and just closed 9 of its 12 stores, while Everlane sold to Shein this week after years of losses. Minimalism was a good business decision for a time – cheap, easy to scale, and broad appeal. But once every brand went clean and minimal, nobody stood out anymore.
Gen Z decided they prefer a little bit of character. So now we get products like Liquid Death, water in a can that looks like an energy drink. Starface makes pimple patches shaped like colourful stars. David produces protein bars that actually stand out from the competition.
A good visual identity shouldn’t be an afterthought. It's why you picked that one off the shelf, why you followed that account, why you bought the thing before even checking the price. Gen Z would rather look interesting than rich, and right now, the brands that look like nothing aren't getting picked.
🧾 INSIDER TRADING
From The Margin group chat:

If you liked this newsletter, hated this newsletter, or are totally indifferent to it, hit the reply button and tell us why! We’re so lonely.
This week’s contributors: Sara Harowitz (writer), Mark Yuen Visuals (photography), Tyler Haw (audience engagement), Jenna Zaitchik (senior creative designer), Shazia Khan (social media strategy manager), Kat Angus (deputy editor), and Eric Wainwright (editor in chief).
Important Legal Disclosures
"The Margin" is a financial news and media platform published by QuestMedia Inc. and is a member of the Questrade Group of Companies. Questrade Group of Companies means Questrade Financial Group and its affiliates that provide deposit, investment, loan, securities, mortgages and other products or services. Our editorial team operates independently, though "The Margin" may promote Questrade services and receive promotional benefits when users click provided links or open accounts.
Not Investment Advice & Risk Warning: All content is for informational and educational purposes only. "The Margin" is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. Nothing published constitutes a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell any security, or to engage in any investment strategy. Trading securities—especially on margin—involves significant risk and can result in the loss of your entire investment. Please consult a qualified financial or tax professional before making any investment decisions.
Limitation of Liability: Content and market data are provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. "The Margin" and its affiliates assume no liability for your trading results or data inaccuracies. Contributors to "The Margin" may hold positions in the securities discussed.
Your personal information is handled in accordance with the Questrade Financial Group Privacy Policy. You may withdraw your consent to receive these emails at any time by clicking "unsubscribe."

